Home to Geordie Stewart's blog on information security awareness, risk communication and security ethics.

Risk IntelligenceRisk Intelligence
Risk Intelligence
Information Security Awareness
  • Home
  • About us
  • Services
  • Awareness Blog
  • Follow Us
  • Contact us
Menu back  

Criminals and Moral Codes

Rumor Has IT – Fake News and Cyber Security

Five Minutes With Lance Spitzner

Security Awareness Tips From A Social Engineer

The Craziest Information Security Stories of 2016

7 Habits of Highly Successful Security Policies

Keeping IT Simple

Polluting The Privacy Debate

About this blog

Martin Luther King said ‘I have a dream’, not ‘I have a plan’

– Simon Sinek

Engaging end users using marketing, psychology and safety theory.

Popular posts

Getting Permission To Use HaveIBeenPwned From Your Legal Dept
4th April 2018
The Craziest Information Security Stories of 2017
4th January 2018
Rumor Has IT: How Fake News Damages Cyber Security
7th June 2017
The Craziest Information Security Stories Of 2016
11th February 2017

About Geordie Stewart

Geordie Stewart, MSc, CISSP, is an international speaker and keen innovator in the area of technology risk communication.

His award winning masters thesis at the Royal Holloway Information Security Group examined information security awareness from a fresh perspective as a marketing and communications challenge. In his regular speaking appearances at international information security conferences such as RSA, ISACA and ISSA he challenges conventional thinking on risk culture and communication.

In addition to senior security management roles in large UK organisations Geordie writes the security awareness column for the ISSA international journal.

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+Instagram

Awareness Blog

View allBlogConferencesFeaturedMental ModelsOrganisational CulturePrivacyRisk CompensationRisk PsychologySafetySecurity AwarenessSecurity EconomicsSecurity MetricsSurveillanceTrust
Jun42012

ISSA Security Awareness Column June 2012 – Security Awareness in Crisis

You wouldn’t know it by looking at it, but the information security awareness industry is in crisis. Humans are increasingly seen as the weak link in information security defences and human factors are increasing in prominence as a preferred exploit. Time after time we’re seeing expensive technical solutions bypassed by a simple call to the helpdesk or someone just asking users for their password. A cynic might say that’s because mistakes are inevitable when humans are involved. However, have we made our best attempt at managing human information security risks? In a series of columns about awareness and risk communications we’ll be taking a fresh look at the ways we attempt to manage human risks.

Technical information security solutions have advanced in leaps and bounds over the last two decades. We now have real time anti-virus, local firewalls and automated patching. It’s a far cry from the old days when we had to remember to load anti-virus manually once we started our computer. By comparison, human security management remains largely unchanged. We create information security policies and publish them on intranets. We hold mandatory training sessions. If the problem is getting worse then what is the solution? More policies? More mandatory training? Or, is there a fundamental problem in how security professionals are approaching the problem? Remind me again what the problem is we’re trying to solve? Our implicit assumption seems to be that the cause of insecure behaviour is a “lack of facts” known by an audience. Hence we distribute information in the hope the behaviour improves. But what if people have heard our message before and that didn’t fix it? Telling people again what they have likely heard before can only have a marginal return at best.

Details
Leave a commentBlog, Mental ModelsBy rskadmin

Death by a Thousand Facts: Criticising the Technocratic Approach to Information Security Awareness

Recently I co-authored a paper “Death by a Thousand Facts” with David Lacey for the HAISA conference where we explored the nature of how technical experts choose what content is included in risk communications. A copy of the proceedings is available here. Basically, mainstream information security awareness techniques are failing to evolve at the same…

Details
Leave a commentBlog, Mental Models, Organisational Culture, Security EconomicsBy rskadmin

Mental Models

mentalmodelsOne of the problems with the current approach to information security awareness is that methodologies such as ENISA are detailed about the logistics of planning security awareness but don’t have much to say about the content of security awareness.

So, how would you determine what information an audience needs to know so that they can manage the risks they face? Mental models offer a structured way of approaching risk communications rather than just “broadcasting facts”.

A mental model is a pattern of understanding held by an individual. It consists of what beliefs they hold, the strength of those beliefs and the connection between beliefs. Safety experts note that when risk communication takes place the audience will have some degree of pre-existing knowledge which forms their mental model:

“…for most risks, people have at least some relevant beliefs, which they will use in interpreting the communication. They may have heard some things about the risk in question. It may remind them of related phenomena.” (Morgan et al 2002)

Details
Leave a commentBlog, Mental ModelsBy rskadmin
12
Prev page
Risk Intelligence
Copyright © 2015 Risk Intelligence Ltd.
  • Home
  • About us
  • Follow Us
  • Contact us
Footer